Real
Estate implications stemming from the new Personal Properties Securities
Register
By Steve Healy and Naomi
Rothman of Gadens Lawyers,
Sydney
Currently, Australia has
different laws and registers in each State and Territory for registering
security over most types of personal property. The Personal Property
Securities (PPS) reform, which is likely to commence early in 2012,
brings together the different Commonwealth, State and Territory laws and
registers under one national system and introduces the online PPS
Register.
Personal property is any form
of property other than land or buildings and fixtures which form part of
that land. It can include tangibles such cars, boats, machinery,
crops - as well as intangibles such as shares, intellectual property and
contract rights.
Unexpectedly, the PPS regime
has implications on real estate – even though the PPS regime is only
intended to relate to personal property.
Abolition of the Nemo
dat rule
As a
result of the PPS regime, the nemo dat rule has been abolished for
personal property. In essence, the nemo dat rule provides
that a person cannot give better title than what the person
had.
Under
the PPS regime, a person who has possession of goods (not necessarily
title of the goods) can pass good title to a purchaser, unless the secured
party has registered a security interest in the goods on the new PPS
register or perfected their security interest.
How does it affect property
transactions?
The
PPS regime can impact real estate transactions. Some of the impacts
on real estate are outlined below.
1. Lease of land that
includes a lease of goods
A lease of land and any lease of fixtures on the land
is excluded from the PPS regime, as personal property does not include
property that is land.
However, many landlords enter into operating leases,
which involve not only the lease of real property, but also goods leased
with the real estate. Therefore, landlords may want to note a PPS
interest in such goods.
For example, a landlord that leases a factory would
not note the lease on the PPS register. However, if the landlord is also
leasing equipment, which is used in the factory as part of the plant and
equipment, which are not fixtures, the landlord may want to register a
PPS interest in that equipment. If the landlord’s interest in that
equipment is not registered, then the landlord runs the risk that
another party (e.g. a liquidator of the tenant, or someone who registers
a security interest in the goods) will have a superior interest in those
items even though the landlord is the owner of those goods.
Therefore, landlords will need to ascertain if
personal property is included in any real property leases and decide
whether it is so material that it is appropriate to protect their
interest by registering a security interest on the PPS register.
In addition, landlords should also consider those
leases entered into prior to the PPS reform. There is a two year
transition period from PPS commencement for finalising new
registrations. Within that two year period pre PPS commencement
interests are given temporary priority. Prudent landlords should take
steps to have their pre-PPS leases reviewed to determine whether there
is personal property leased, and if so, to register a security interest
before the end of the transitional period (estimated to be June
2013).
Landlords may want to conduct that review early or
late during the period. Gadens Lawyers can assist landlords with
that review.
2. Incentives
under leases
Many landlords negotiate deals involving lease
incentives. For example, the landlord may provide some incentive by way
of a new fitout provided to the tenant. In many instances the
arrangement is that the landlord provides and owns the fitout. If the
landlord does not register its interest in the fitout on the PPS
register, it runs the risk that a person with a registered security
interest against the tenant will have a superior interest in the
fitout.
It would be prudent for landlords involved in this leasing
process to register their interest in furniture and fittings acquired
from lease incentives such as this on the PPS register.
3. Real estate
purchases including personal property
-
Purchasers of business real estate should consider
whether the purchase involves any personal property.
For example, a business purchasing a hotel may also
be purchasing:
-
stock-in-trade;
-
consignment items;
and
-
bailment
items.
There may be registered security interests in these
items. Businesses should therefore carry out searches of the PPS
register to determine whether there are any outstanding interests over
these items.
-
Purchasers of
commercial buildings should also consider possible personal property
comprised in the sale. To be sure as an incoming purchaser that you
are taking over all items of the sale, for example, the landlord’s
fittings, you would need to check the PPS register as part of your due
diligence to determine whether there are any registered security
interests over such items.
-
Development site
purchases may include a development consents, drawings, designs, etc.
These are interests that should be checked against the register on
acquisitions.
Require
assistance?
The
new PPS reforms present implications for the real estate market and market
players should be aware of any potential PPS interests that may arise as a
result of certain property transactions. Those interests should be
registered on the PPS register accordingly, so that those interests are
protected from completing claims of other parties who have perfected their
interests. Gadens Lawyers can help you prepare for PPS and
protect your potential PPS interests.
This report does not comprise legal advice
and neither Gadens Lawyers nor the authors accept any responsibility
for it.